Sunday, November 22, 2009
Saturday, April 18, 2009
prayer
src="http://media.rasoulallah.net/video/lessons/How2enjoyPrayer_1.rm" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin" nojava="true" autostart="true" maintainaspect="false" controls="imagewindow" console="64379" vspace="0" hspace="0" border="0"> type="audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin" nojava="true" autostart="true" maintainaspect="false" controls="controlpanel,statusbar" console="64379" vspace="0" hspace="0" border="0"> |
">http://rasoulallah.net
Thursday, May 1, 2008
Wikipedia
People love freedom. People want everything free. People like to read anything without paying money. Where they can find that? People can find that in the Internet, especially in the Wikipedia website. There are good websites that are Wikipedia and Wikimapia. In the first one people find a lot of information while in the second people can see the map of the world or any place they want to see in the map. People can write anything in Wikipedia, but this has some risks. Therefore, using Wikipedia should be controlled by the government because it is free, easy, and new information.
The first reason that Wikipedia should be controlled is the freedom of Wikipedia. People need the Internet, and they want to find good information when they open the net world. But some information may be wrong, so for academic research, professors do not advise using Wikipedia. According to Bilodeau (2008), “academics who ban students from using the web, Google, Wikipedia, or similar resources are doing those students a grave disservice. Students need to learn how to assess the relevance and authority of information sources independent of their media. They need to learn what constitutes an authoritative source, in academic and especially in their field of study. They need to learn how to navigate the complexities and ambiguities of the information at their disposal” (para.11). People can change any information in Wikipedia. People need something to protect their writing.
The second reason for government should control the Wikipedia is using Wikipedia is easy. Since using the Internet is extended in the world, anyone can enter his or her computer and open any page in the Internet. If anyone writes wikipedia.com, he or she will see the Wikipedia website. Then writing any subject in the research place, this person can find many things about that. According to Parry (2008), “literacy in modern society means not only being able to read a variety of informational formats; it means being able to participate in their creation, with Wikipedia serving as the marquee example” (para.9). Also, Wikipedia is very easy to use. The new generation can use it very quickly.
Finally, Wikipedia has new information. This information may be wrong, or may be put in this website for some bad goals. Therefore, some people do not use Wikipedia, especially for important information. According to Martin (2008), “under the current system, anyone can edit an entry at any time, which means that people often post inaccurate and sometimes malicious information” (para.5). Any person can edit any new information in the Wikipedia, and this is not good in the information field.
In conclusion, Wikipedia as a part of the Internet is very important if the people use it as a good website; it is good and useful. But some people in the world, alas, use the Internet to destroy everything. Some people look at the world as a farm that their parents own it, but in fact is not that. In fact is that life is for everyone who likes to live, not for whoever likes to damage the life. Therefore, government should put control not only on the Wikipedia website, but also on all free websites in the Internet.
References:
Bildeau, E. (2008, January 14). Academic banning of Google and Wikipedia misguided. Weblog Of Edward Bilodeau. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from http://www.coolweblog.com/bilodeau/archives/oo3743.html
Martin, N. (2008, Jan 21). Wikipedia clamps down on ‘unreliable’ editors. Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/20/wiki120.xml
Parry, D. (2008, Feb 11). Wikipedia and the new curriculum. Science Progress. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/02/wikipedia-and-the-new-curriculum/
The first reason that Wikipedia should be controlled is the freedom of Wikipedia. People need the Internet, and they want to find good information when they open the net world. But some information may be wrong, so for academic research, professors do not advise using Wikipedia. According to Bilodeau (2008), “academics who ban students from using the web, Google, Wikipedia, or similar resources are doing those students a grave disservice. Students need to learn how to assess the relevance and authority of information sources independent of their media. They need to learn what constitutes an authoritative source, in academic and especially in their field of study. They need to learn how to navigate the complexities and ambiguities of the information at their disposal” (para.11). People can change any information in Wikipedia. People need something to protect their writing.
The second reason for government should control the Wikipedia is using Wikipedia is easy. Since using the Internet is extended in the world, anyone can enter his or her computer and open any page in the Internet. If anyone writes wikipedia.com, he or she will see the Wikipedia website. Then writing any subject in the research place, this person can find many things about that. According to Parry (2008), “literacy in modern society means not only being able to read a variety of informational formats; it means being able to participate in their creation, with Wikipedia serving as the marquee example” (para.9). Also, Wikipedia is very easy to use. The new generation can use it very quickly.
Finally, Wikipedia has new information. This information may be wrong, or may be put in this website for some bad goals. Therefore, some people do not use Wikipedia, especially for important information. According to Martin (2008), “under the current system, anyone can edit an entry at any time, which means that people often post inaccurate and sometimes malicious information” (para.5). Any person can edit any new information in the Wikipedia, and this is not good in the information field.
In conclusion, Wikipedia as a part of the Internet is very important if the people use it as a good website; it is good and useful. But some people in the world, alas, use the Internet to destroy everything. Some people look at the world as a farm that their parents own it, but in fact is not that. In fact is that life is for everyone who likes to live, not for whoever likes to damage the life. Therefore, government should put control not only on the Wikipedia website, but also on all free websites in the Internet.
References:
Bildeau, E. (2008, January 14). Academic banning of Google and Wikipedia misguided. Weblog Of Edward Bilodeau. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from http://www.coolweblog.com/bilodeau/archives/oo3743.html
Martin, N. (2008, Jan 21). Wikipedia clamps down on ‘unreliable’ editors. Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/20/wiki120.xml
Parry, D. (2008, Feb 11). Wikipedia and the new curriculum. Science Progress. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/02/wikipedia-and-the-new-curriculum/
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Shell
There is fire. Oh, where? Beside the Shell gas station. A big accident happened on the road near a garden. Why? There is more oil on the road from a truck, which transports oil from Shell Company. Because of Shell, there are many problems that have happened in the world. Shell products cause pollution of the environment, Shell is a killer, and Shell is a Monopoly Company. But Shell is very important in the world. Shell is providing oil to people. People are using the oil for heating, cooking, and air conditioning. Shell supports companies with oil. Companies require oil to work and to produce. Shell makes a large amount of money from selling oil and other products. Shell made announcements in marketing with the purpose of marketing their products, but some people say they made deceptive advertisements without showing defective products. People expect Shell to provide them with petroleum products and still maintain their health and the environment. However, other people say Shell is one of the biggest companies that support the other companies of energy technology and people need the products of this company. In “Shell tackles energy challenges with cutting-edge technology” the author says “Shell has undertaken to tackle world energy challenges” (2007, para.2). Some people say Shell is evil. Why do they say that? They say that because the environment has become polluted and the health of its employees is not good. Therefore, governments should put more restrictions on Shell Company for many reasons. First, Shell is anti-environmental. Second, it causes disease for its employees. Third, Shell concentrates only on profit.
What is Shell? What does this name mean in the world? Shell is a big company in oil production. Shell is one of the biggest companies in the world that makes money every year. According to shell.com, it gives the definition of Shell; “Shell is a worldwide group of oil, gas and petrochemical companies with interests in biofuels, wind and solar power and hydrogen” (n.d., para.1). Shell started in the beginning of last century. In “Our history” the owners of Shell Company claim that “Shell companies first entered the chemicals industry in 1929, via a partnership in the Netherlands called NV Mekog, which manufactured ammonia from coke-oven gas” (n.d., para.1). Shell concentrates on money; it has a lot of money. Shell produces more oil to make more money. Shell gains some billion every year. According to Sterling (2008), “Shell's full-year net profit was $31US.3 billion (€21.2 billion), up 23 percent from $24US.4 billion, while sales rose 12 percent to $356US billion (€241 billion)” (para.17). Shell depends on crude oil, which is imported from many places by big ships. Shell buys the crude oil from the Arabian Gulf area, Nigeria, and other places. It buys the crude oil at a low price and sells it at a high price, so Shell makes huge money.
The first reason that governments should be put more restriction on Shell is environmental. Shell products are anti-environmental. Shell makes problems for people. For example, while trucks transport the oil from the store of companies to the gas stations, there is oil that falls over the roads and the force friction becomes very little. Therefore, many accidents will happen because of that oil. In addition, Shell gas emitted in the air, causing pollution of the environment. Kanter (2007) writes, “Shell causes 60 times more greenhouse gas emissions than the carbon dioxide that is reused by Dutch farmers to grow flowers” (para.8). That uses gas from Shell, a giant company, for causing air pollution at a large rate. If anyone is walking beside the place where there are oil refineries, he will breathe bad air. People want a beautiful environment, and they require preserving it by all means available. Shell and other oil companies that produce marrow oil cause pollution of the environment. There are many cooperatives in the world that try to protect the environment. Those co-operations work very well and hard in many countries, especially in Germany, to keep a clean environment.
Second, Shell caused diseases to its employees. Shell sometimes killed its employees. According to Weissert (2006), “Panamanian authorities have blamed it on an expired batch of glycerin manufactured in Spain. But outside experts are skeptical of that theory because glycerin, which occurs naturally in the human body and is added to many products, is highly stable and unlikely to break down” (para.13). Employees breathe through oil. Even if health insurance is strong, the health problems caused by the inhalation of oil cannot be redressed absolutely. The workers in the area of oil are unknown soldiers in the service of humanity, and everyone should stand in respect for them and treat them with the best treatment. Shell does not provide full protection for employees working in the oil wells. In “AP Executive Morning Briefing” the author states, (In Yenagoa, Nigeria), “Armed men have seized control of an oil complex in southern Nigeria owned by a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell PLC, authorities said Friday. No deaths were reported but one man was shot in the overnight attack on the facility, an operating base that houses staff and stores equipment, said Joshua Benemesia, a local chief who has mediated hostage negotiations in Nigeria's oil-rich delta region” (2008, para.7). Shell does not care for its employees, or whether they lived or died.
Finally, not only is Shell anti-environment, and it causes disease for its employees, but also it concentrates only on profit. Shell, which is like any other big business company in the world, will have as an objective material profit. It is not surprising permission of the hard material profit. But a lot of people say that many of their profits and prices are very high. Shell benefited from the capitalist system to achieve very high profits. In “Technology and the Oil Chemicals Advantage” the author says “Maintaining that leading edge calls for improvements in existing processes, plus the development of next-generation technologies that will utilise feedstocks from more sources, at a lower cost and with a reduced environmental impact” (2006, para.2). Shell claims that, but if you look to the price of Shell product, it is high. In last two years, Shell investigates huge money. According to Krauss (2007), “Exxon and Shell Report Record Profits for 2006” the writer says “Shell reported a 21 percent rise in its fourth-quarter earnings, to $5.28 billion. That was mostly a result of a 4.1 percent increase in daily production of oil, to 3.65 million barrels, in the quarter. The company also continued to profit from its superior marketing and refining ability outside the United States” (para.18). In 2007, Shell makes more profit. In “Shell posts $27.6 billion profit in 2007” the writer says “Royal Dutch Shell reignited anger over excessive profits today after revealing it made $27.6 billion (£13.9 billion) in 2007 - a new record for a UK company” (2008, para.2). Shell investigates more profit and it is from the list which has the biggest companies that get more profit in the world.
Opponents of more restrictions on Shell say Shell is very good for some reasons: it provides the people with oil and people can use the oil for heating and air conditioning. Also Shell supported the companies-especially information technology companies- with oil to continue and produce. Shell can do that since it produces more oil. According to “Shell tackles energy challenges with cutting-edge technology” (2007), “Shell produces more oil and gas than any other private energy company and serves more than 25 million retail customers every day” (para.4). People believe that Shell presents great services to them for energy. In Shell website, Shell Company claims that “We help meet global energy demand in economically, environmentally and socially responsible ways.” Shell can do that since it has more money, but it does not do that. Shell shares projects to gain money. According to “Shell CEO defends strong profits” (2006), the interviewer says “we have to demonstrate clearly why it is to the advantage, for example of governments, to work with Shell and that can be to their advantage because we can execute projects at lower costs or we can recover the oil better or we have new technologies. We have clearly to demonstrate that it is always to the advantage of the governments to work with Shell. And if we do that then our future looks okay” (para.13). Some people say Shell can construct projects to solve the unemployment problem. A lot of young people have dreams to work with big companies like Shell. Those young people may be sad after a few months when they work in difficult places without security.
In conclusion, Shell is anti-environmental and anti-health of humans. Also Shell is greedy. Therefore, Governments must put more restrictions on Shell to become a good company. Shell could be a good company if it is not concentrated only on profit. It should encourage other companies to give a little money from profits to help people in their life. It can help people by constructing projects, making high quality products, and decreasing the price. Shell must help the young people who seek jobs by making a project for them. If Shell gives 2% of its profit to a co-operative society, it will help them to do some project and it will be better than another company. Shell is killing its employees; Shell focuses on profit without any responsibility for its employees. Shell can increase the security precautions to protect its employees. All people want to live in peace and security in everything. They want to satisfy food security and availability of fuel at reasonable prices for all.
References:
AP Executive Morning Briefing. (2006, December 15). Associated Press Online. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Kanter, J. (2007, July 6). Shell told to withdraw Dutch ad with green claims. The International Herald Tribune. Retrieved on April 22, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Krauss, C. (2007, February 2). Exxon and Shell Report Record Profits for 2006. The New York Times. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from google.com
Our history. (n.d.). Shell Chemicals. Retrieved on April 22, 2008, from http://www.shellchemicals.com/aboutus/1,1098,52,00.html
Shell CEO defends strong profits. (2006, May 4). CNN.com. Retrieved on March 26, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Shell posts $27.6 billion profit in 2007. (2008, January 31). Google.com. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from http://cronespeaks.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/shell-posts-276billion-profit-in-2007/
Shell tackles energy challenges with cutting-edge technology. (2007, October 22). Middle East Company News Wire. Retrieved on March 26, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Shell worldwide. (n.d.). Shell. Retrieved on April 22, 2008, from shell.com
Sterling, T. (2008, January 31). Shell 4Q net profit rises 60 percent to $8US.47 billion. The Associated Press. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database
Technology and the oil chemicals advantages. (2006, September 20). Chemical Week. Retrieved on April 12, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Weissert, W. (2006, October 27). Contaminated Medicine Kills 34 in Panama. Associated Press Online. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
What is Shell? What does this name mean in the world? Shell is a big company in oil production. Shell is one of the biggest companies in the world that makes money every year. According to shell.com, it gives the definition of Shell; “Shell is a worldwide group of oil, gas and petrochemical companies with interests in biofuels, wind and solar power and hydrogen” (n.d., para.1). Shell started in the beginning of last century. In “Our history” the owners of Shell Company claim that “Shell companies first entered the chemicals industry in 1929, via a partnership in the Netherlands called NV Mekog, which manufactured ammonia from coke-oven gas” (n.d., para.1). Shell concentrates on money; it has a lot of money. Shell produces more oil to make more money. Shell gains some billion every year. According to Sterling (2008), “Shell's full-year net profit was $31US.3 billion (€21.2 billion), up 23 percent from $24US.4 billion, while sales rose 12 percent to $356US billion (€241 billion)” (para.17). Shell depends on crude oil, which is imported from many places by big ships. Shell buys the crude oil from the Arabian Gulf area, Nigeria, and other places. It buys the crude oil at a low price and sells it at a high price, so Shell makes huge money.
The first reason that governments should be put more restriction on Shell is environmental. Shell products are anti-environmental. Shell makes problems for people. For example, while trucks transport the oil from the store of companies to the gas stations, there is oil that falls over the roads and the force friction becomes very little. Therefore, many accidents will happen because of that oil. In addition, Shell gas emitted in the air, causing pollution of the environment. Kanter (2007) writes, “Shell causes 60 times more greenhouse gas emissions than the carbon dioxide that is reused by Dutch farmers to grow flowers” (para.8). That uses gas from Shell, a giant company, for causing air pollution at a large rate. If anyone is walking beside the place where there are oil refineries, he will breathe bad air. People want a beautiful environment, and they require preserving it by all means available. Shell and other oil companies that produce marrow oil cause pollution of the environment. There are many cooperatives in the world that try to protect the environment. Those co-operations work very well and hard in many countries, especially in Germany, to keep a clean environment.
Second, Shell caused diseases to its employees. Shell sometimes killed its employees. According to Weissert (2006), “Panamanian authorities have blamed it on an expired batch of glycerin manufactured in Spain. But outside experts are skeptical of that theory because glycerin, which occurs naturally in the human body and is added to many products, is highly stable and unlikely to break down” (para.13). Employees breathe through oil. Even if health insurance is strong, the health problems caused by the inhalation of oil cannot be redressed absolutely. The workers in the area of oil are unknown soldiers in the service of humanity, and everyone should stand in respect for them and treat them with the best treatment. Shell does not provide full protection for employees working in the oil wells. In “AP Executive Morning Briefing” the author states, (In Yenagoa, Nigeria), “Armed men have seized control of an oil complex in southern Nigeria owned by a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell PLC, authorities said Friday. No deaths were reported but one man was shot in the overnight attack on the facility, an operating base that houses staff and stores equipment, said Joshua Benemesia, a local chief who has mediated hostage negotiations in Nigeria's oil-rich delta region” (2008, para.7). Shell does not care for its employees, or whether they lived or died.
Finally, not only is Shell anti-environment, and it causes disease for its employees, but also it concentrates only on profit. Shell, which is like any other big business company in the world, will have as an objective material profit. It is not surprising permission of the hard material profit. But a lot of people say that many of their profits and prices are very high. Shell benefited from the capitalist system to achieve very high profits. In “Technology and the Oil Chemicals Advantage” the author says “Maintaining that leading edge calls for improvements in existing processes, plus the development of next-generation technologies that will utilise feedstocks from more sources, at a lower cost and with a reduced environmental impact” (2006, para.2). Shell claims that, but if you look to the price of Shell product, it is high. In last two years, Shell investigates huge money. According to Krauss (2007), “Exxon and Shell Report Record Profits for 2006” the writer says “Shell reported a 21 percent rise in its fourth-quarter earnings, to $5.28 billion. That was mostly a result of a 4.1 percent increase in daily production of oil, to 3.65 million barrels, in the quarter. The company also continued to profit from its superior marketing and refining ability outside the United States” (para.18). In 2007, Shell makes more profit. In “Shell posts $27.6 billion profit in 2007” the writer says “Royal Dutch Shell reignited anger over excessive profits today after revealing it made $27.6 billion (£13.9 billion) in 2007 - a new record for a UK company” (2008, para.2). Shell investigates more profit and it is from the list which has the biggest companies that get more profit in the world.
Opponents of more restrictions on Shell say Shell is very good for some reasons: it provides the people with oil and people can use the oil for heating and air conditioning. Also Shell supported the companies-especially information technology companies- with oil to continue and produce. Shell can do that since it produces more oil. According to “Shell tackles energy challenges with cutting-edge technology” (2007), “Shell produces more oil and gas than any other private energy company and serves more than 25 million retail customers every day” (para.4). People believe that Shell presents great services to them for energy. In Shell website, Shell Company claims that “We help meet global energy demand in economically, environmentally and socially responsible ways.” Shell can do that since it has more money, but it does not do that. Shell shares projects to gain money. According to “Shell CEO defends strong profits” (2006), the interviewer says “we have to demonstrate clearly why it is to the advantage, for example of governments, to work with Shell and that can be to their advantage because we can execute projects at lower costs or we can recover the oil better or we have new technologies. We have clearly to demonstrate that it is always to the advantage of the governments to work with Shell. And if we do that then our future looks okay” (para.13). Some people say Shell can construct projects to solve the unemployment problem. A lot of young people have dreams to work with big companies like Shell. Those young people may be sad after a few months when they work in difficult places without security.
In conclusion, Shell is anti-environmental and anti-health of humans. Also Shell is greedy. Therefore, Governments must put more restrictions on Shell to become a good company. Shell could be a good company if it is not concentrated only on profit. It should encourage other companies to give a little money from profits to help people in their life. It can help people by constructing projects, making high quality products, and decreasing the price. Shell must help the young people who seek jobs by making a project for them. If Shell gives 2% of its profit to a co-operative society, it will help them to do some project and it will be better than another company. Shell is killing its employees; Shell focuses on profit without any responsibility for its employees. Shell can increase the security precautions to protect its employees. All people want to live in peace and security in everything. They want to satisfy food security and availability of fuel at reasonable prices for all.
References:
AP Executive Morning Briefing. (2006, December 15). Associated Press Online. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Kanter, J. (2007, July 6). Shell told to withdraw Dutch ad with green claims. The International Herald Tribune. Retrieved on April 22, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Krauss, C. (2007, February 2). Exxon and Shell Report Record Profits for 2006. The New York Times. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from google.com
Our history. (n.d.). Shell Chemicals. Retrieved on April 22, 2008, from http://www.shellchemicals.com/aboutus/1,1098,52,00.html
Shell CEO defends strong profits. (2006, May 4). CNN.com. Retrieved on March 26, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Shell posts $27.6 billion profit in 2007. (2008, January 31). Google.com. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from http://cronespeaks.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/shell-posts-276billion-profit-in-2007/
Shell tackles energy challenges with cutting-edge technology. (2007, October 22). Middle East Company News Wire. Retrieved on March 26, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Shell worldwide. (n.d.). Shell. Retrieved on April 22, 2008, from shell.com
Sterling, T. (2008, January 31). Shell 4Q net profit rises 60 percent to $8US.47 billion. The Associated Press. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database
Technology and the oil chemicals advantages. (2006, September 20). Chemical Week. Retrieved on April 12, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Weissert, W. (2006, October 27). Contaminated Medicine Kills 34 in Panama. Associated Press Online. Retrieved on April 23, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Shell
There is fire. Oh, where? Beside the Shell gas station. A big accident happened on the road near a garden. Why? There is more oil on the road from a truck, which transports oil from Shell Company. Because of Shell, there are many problems that have happened in the world. But Shell is very important in the world. Shell is providing oil to people and supporting companies with oil. Shell makes a large amount of money from selling oil and other products. Shell made announcements in marketing with the purpose of marketing their products, but some people say they made deceptive advertisements without showing defective products. People expect Shell to provide them with petroleum products and still maintain their health and the environment. However, other people say Shell is one of the biggest companies that support the other companies of energy technology and people need the products of this company. According to “Shell tackles energy challenges with cutting-edge technology” (2007), the author says “Shell has undertaken to tackle world energy challenges” (para.2). Some people say Shell is evil. Why do they say that? They say that because the environment has become polluted and the health of its employees is not good. Therefore, governments should put more restrictions on Shell Company for many reasons. First, Shell is anti-environmental. Second, it causes disease for its employees. Third, Shell concentrates only on profit.
The first reason that governments should be put more restriction on Shell is environmental. Shell products are anti-environmental. For example, while trucks transport the oil from the store of companies to the gas stations, there are oil fall over the roads. Therefore, many accidents will lie because that oil. In addition, Packages aimed oil after use caused pollution of the environment.
Second, Shell caused diseases to its employees. Shell sometimes killed its employees. They breathe through oil. Even if health insurance is strong, the health problems caused by the inhalation of oil cannot be redressed absolutely. The workers in the area of oil are unknown soldiers in the service of humanity, and everyone should stand in respect for them and treat them with the best treatment.
Finally, not only is Shell anti-environment, and it causes disease for its employees, but also it concentrates only on profit. Shell, which is like any other big business company will have as an objective material profit. It is not surprising permission of the hard material profit. But a lot of people say that many of their profits and prices are very high.
Opponents of more restrictions on Shell say Shell is very good for some reasons: it provides the people with oil and people can use the oil for heating and air conditioning. Also Shell supported the companies-especially information technology companies- with oil to continue and produce. Shell can do that since it produces more oil. According to “Technology and the oil chemicals advantages” (2006); “Shell produces more oil and gas than any other private energy company and serves more than 25 million retail customers every day” (para.7). People believe that Shell presents great services to them for energy.
In conclusion, Shell is anti-environmental and anti-health of humans. Governments must put more restrictions on Shell to become a good company. Shell must help the young people who seek jobs by making a project for them. If Shell gives 2% of its profit to a co-operative society, it will help them be better than another company. Shell is killing its employees; Shell focuses on profit without any responsibility for its employees.
References:
Shell tackles energy challenges with cutting-edge technology. (2007, October 22). Middle East Company News Wire. Retrieved on March 26, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Shell CEO defends strong profits. (2006, May 4). CNN.com. Retrieved on March 26, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Technology and the oil chemicals advantages. (2006, September 20). Chemical Week. Retrieved on April 12, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
The first reason that governments should be put more restriction on Shell is environmental. Shell products are anti-environmental. For example, while trucks transport the oil from the store of companies to the gas stations, there are oil fall over the roads. Therefore, many accidents will lie because that oil. In addition, Packages aimed oil after use caused pollution of the environment.
Second, Shell caused diseases to its employees. Shell sometimes killed its employees. They breathe through oil. Even if health insurance is strong, the health problems caused by the inhalation of oil cannot be redressed absolutely. The workers in the area of oil are unknown soldiers in the service of humanity, and everyone should stand in respect for them and treat them with the best treatment.
Finally, not only is Shell anti-environment, and it causes disease for its employees, but also it concentrates only on profit. Shell, which is like any other big business company will have as an objective material profit. It is not surprising permission of the hard material profit. But a lot of people say that many of their profits and prices are very high.
Opponents of more restrictions on Shell say Shell is very good for some reasons: it provides the people with oil and people can use the oil for heating and air conditioning. Also Shell supported the companies-especially information technology companies- with oil to continue and produce. Shell can do that since it produces more oil. According to “Technology and the oil chemicals advantages” (2006); “Shell produces more oil and gas than any other private energy company and serves more than 25 million retail customers every day” (para.7). People believe that Shell presents great services to them for energy.
In conclusion, Shell is anti-environmental and anti-health of humans. Governments must put more restrictions on Shell to become a good company. Shell must help the young people who seek jobs by making a project for them. If Shell gives 2% of its profit to a co-operative society, it will help them be better than another company. Shell is killing its employees; Shell focuses on profit without any responsibility for its employees.
References:
Shell tackles energy challenges with cutting-edge technology. (2007, October 22). Middle East Company News Wire. Retrieved on March 26, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Shell CEO defends strong profits. (2006, May 4). CNN.com. Retrieved on March 26, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Technology and the oil chemicals advantages. (2006, September 20). Chemical Week. Retrieved on April 12, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
Shell and Energy
In Shell tackles energy challenges with cutting-edge technology (2007), the author says that Shell has an important role to play for energy chemicals in the world. He explains that this world has a dilemma in oil. He mentions that there is a conference that was held in Kuwait from October 22-25th, 2007; this conference discussed the problem and solution of energy sources. Shell offered to provide technologies. Shell is one of the international oil production companies. The author says that Shell can create new designs for energy command. The author talks about Shell in the Middle East, and there have been many conferences in the last 100 years. Shell has succeeded in the world, especially in the areas of technology. Shell looks now to develop its energy production.
Energy is life these days, is it not? Can people travel from overseas to the US without energy? Can people have the development of technology without energy? The answer of the last two questions is no; people cannot do or have that. Energy is very important in life. Energy depends on oil, but the oil will finish in the future. Therefore, scientists must seek alternative energy. Shell is one of the biggest companies in the world that has profits from oil, and when the oil fades away, Shell will be bankrupt if it does not find an alternative. Shell Company should be very important for energy for many reasons: it should keep producing oil, keep the environment, and encourage investments in new technology.
First, Shell Company produces a lot of oil, which is essential in the world now. In the 21st century, the demand for oil will be increased. Therefore, Shell can produce more oil to cover all demands, and then it can be satisfied with more profits from that. Shell can produce more energy from oil and develop new sources. Energy is very important for people; it is important for cooking, heating, and air conditioning. If Shell produces more energy, it will be satisfied with more profits.
Moreover, Shell keeps the environment. Because of high quality oil in Shell, it keeps the environment clean. Using many services that depend on oil changes climate. Shell holds all constituents to make many studies about our climate. Shell is using a good machine to reach its production to the people. For example, Shell uses good ships to transport crude oil from the original source, so no oil falls over the water. Therefore, Shell helps people by keeping the environment.
Finally, Shell encourages investments in new technology by making many studies. People need solutions for producing oil. Shell rivals many companies in the world by giving the best product. Technology requires the best and fastest production. For example, new communications require energy and oil to give people the best service when they use cell phone, Internet, or mail.
In conclusion, Shell is one of the biggest companies of the world. Shell saves energy to produce energy. Shell will be the best company in the world in the future because it has many branches in the world and gives the people many good services with a good price. People want to see many companies like Shell and a rivalry between them. That is because if there are more good companies, the product becomes higher quality and the price goes down.
Reference:
Shell tackles energy challenges with cutting-edge technology. (2007, October 22). Middle East Company News Wire. Retrieved on March 26, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Energy is life these days, is it not? Can people travel from overseas to the US without energy? Can people have the development of technology without energy? The answer of the last two questions is no; people cannot do or have that. Energy is very important in life. Energy depends on oil, but the oil will finish in the future. Therefore, scientists must seek alternative energy. Shell is one of the biggest companies in the world that has profits from oil, and when the oil fades away, Shell will be bankrupt if it does not find an alternative. Shell Company should be very important for energy for many reasons: it should keep producing oil, keep the environment, and encourage investments in new technology.
First, Shell Company produces a lot of oil, which is essential in the world now. In the 21st century, the demand for oil will be increased. Therefore, Shell can produce more oil to cover all demands, and then it can be satisfied with more profits from that. Shell can produce more energy from oil and develop new sources. Energy is very important for people; it is important for cooking, heating, and air conditioning. If Shell produces more energy, it will be satisfied with more profits.
Moreover, Shell keeps the environment. Because of high quality oil in Shell, it keeps the environment clean. Using many services that depend on oil changes climate. Shell holds all constituents to make many studies about our climate. Shell is using a good machine to reach its production to the people. For example, Shell uses good ships to transport crude oil from the original source, so no oil falls over the water. Therefore, Shell helps people by keeping the environment.
Finally, Shell encourages investments in new technology by making many studies. People need solutions for producing oil. Shell rivals many companies in the world by giving the best product. Technology requires the best and fastest production. For example, new communications require energy and oil to give people the best service when they use cell phone, Internet, or mail.
In conclusion, Shell is one of the biggest companies of the world. Shell saves energy to produce energy. Shell will be the best company in the world in the future because it has many branches in the world and gives the people many good services with a good price. People want to see many companies like Shell and a rivalry between them. That is because if there are more good companies, the product becomes higher quality and the price goes down.
Reference:
Shell tackles energy challenges with cutting-edge technology. (2007, October 22). Middle East Company News Wire. Retrieved on March 26, 2008, from Lexis Nexis database.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)